MoneyVedas Learn

Lesson 07 · Foundations

Fundamental analysis & how to read financials

By Robin CB · AI market analyst & investor

Profit is an opinion; cash is a fact. This lesson teaches the three statements, the ratios that matter with Indian benchmarks, the governance checks specific to promoter-controlled companies, and a repeatable 60-minute routine. Company names appear only as historical illustrations — never as recommendations.

Last updated 31 Oct 2026 · Nothing here is investment advice

The three statements — what each shows, and how they connect

Every listed Indian company publishes three core financial statements under SEBI's LODR Regulations, 2015: quarterly results within 45 days of quarter-end (60 days for the final quarter/financial year), audited annual results within 60 days of year-end, and the annual report under Regulation 34. The shareholding pattern is filed quarterly within 21 days. All of it lands on the BSE/NSE websites in real time, and is mirrored in readable form on free platforms such as Screener.in and Trendlyne. The company website's investor-relations page is the most authoritative copy.

Profit & Loss (P&L) statement — performance over a period

Revenue (sales) minus all expenses = profit. Read it top to bottom: revenue growth first, then operating profit (EBITDA), then profit before tax, then net profit (PAT). Two disciplines matter: separate operating from "other income" — a company whose profit grows because of treasury income, asset sales, or one-off gains is not the same as one whose core operations are improving; and watch exceptional items — frequent "one-time" charges that recur every year are not one-time. Reconcile any "adjusted" profit figure back to the reported Ind AS number before trusting it.

Balance sheet — position at a point in time

The accounting identity: Assets = Liabilities + Shareholders' Equity. It is a snapshot, not a movie. Look for: how much debt the company carries, how much of its assets are funded by shareholders vs lenders, how large receivables and inventory are relative to sales, and whether the equity base keeps getting diluted by fresh share issues. A balance sheet that grows only because debt grows is a different business from one that grows from retained profits.

Cash flow statement — actual cash movement, in three buckets

  1. Operating cash flow (CFO): cash generated by the core business.
  2. Investing cash flow (CFI): capex, acquisitions, asset sales — usually negative for a growing company.
  3. Financing cash flow (CFF): borrowings, repayments, dividends, share issues/buybacks.

Free cash flow (FCF) = CFO − maintenance capex. It is the cash the business actually produces after keeping itself running, and it is the number valuation ultimately rests on.

How the three connect

Profit in the P&L that never arrives as cash shows up as a receivable or inventory on the balance sheet and as an absence in the cash flow statement. Debt raised shows up as cash in financing flows and as a liability on the balance sheet; the interest then drags on future P&Ls. Read all three together: a strong balance sheet + profitable P&L + positive operating cash flow is the baseline for a trustworthy business. Any one leg missing demands an explanation.

Practical note on data: Screener.in offers clean 10-year annual data free, with an "Export to Excel" option (login required). For the primary record, always cross-check against the exchange filing or annual report — aggregators occasionally misclassify line items.

The ratios that matter — formulas, Indian benchmarks, blind spots

Ratios are only useful against peers in the same sector and against the company's own history. A "good" number in FMCG is meaningless in steel. Use 5–10 year trends, not single-year snapshots.

Profitability

RatioFormulaSensible reading (India)Blind spot
ROENet profit ÷ average shareholders' equitySustained >15–20% is strong; >20% is generally read as good capital useCan be inflated by leverage — high ROE with mediocre ROCE means borrowing is producing the return
ROCEEBIT ÷ capital employed (equity + debt)Must exceed the cost of borrowing; with Indian lending rates typically 9–12%, ROCE below ~10% is destroying valueCapital employed definitions vary; check Screener's definition before comparing
Operating marginOperating profit ÷ revenueCompare within sector only; rising margin + rising sales is the healthy combinationA margin rising because the company stopped investing (capex, R&D, marketing) is not strength
Net marginNet profit ÷ revenueUseful for cross-sector sanity, not rankingDistorted by other income, tax rates, and one-offs

Decompose ROE before trusting it. The same ROE can come from a superb operating business or from leverage doing the heavy lifting. If ROE is high but ROCE is ordinary, leverage — not the business — is producing the return, and the risk sits with you.

Leverage

RatioFormulaSensible readingBlind spot
Debt-to-equityTotal borrowings ÷ shareholders' equityBelow ~0.5 is comfortable for most non-financials; above 1 demands a very good explanation"Debt" on Screener may exclude lease liabilities and off-balance-sheet items — check the annual report's notes
Interest coverageOperating profit ÷ interest expenseAbove ~4x means a 30–40% earnings dip still services debtUses accounting profit, not cash; pair with CFO ÷ interest
Net debt / EBITDA(Borrowings − cash) ÷ EBITDABelow ~2–3x is comfortable for most sectorsEBITDA is not cash flow; capex-heavy businesses can look fine here and still be cash-short

Banks, NBFCs, and insurers are different animals: debt is their raw material, so D/E and interest coverage do not apply. Judge them on capital adequacy, asset quality (NPAs), and return on assets instead.

Efficiency — the working-capital engine

Valuation

RatioFormulaUseBlind spot
P/EPrice ÷ earnings per share (TTM)The default shorthand; compare vs sector and vs the company's own 5-year medianUseless for loss-makers; dangerously misleading for cyclicals (lowest P/E at cycle peaks); ignores debt; distorted by one-offs
PEGP/E ÷ expected EPS growth rate (%)Adds growth context; ~1.0 is the classic "fair value" rule of thumb (Peter Lynch)Depends entirely on growth forecasts; assumes linear growth; meaningless for cyclicals and loss-makers
EV/EBITDAEnterprise value ÷ EBITDABalance-sheet-aware; good for comparing leveraged peersEBITDA ignores capex, working capital, and cash taxes; flatters asset-heavy businesses
P/BPrice ÷ book value per shareUseful for banks, financials, asset-heavy cyclicalsBook value can be stale or meaningless for asset-light businesses whose value is intangible
Dividend yieldDividend per share ÷ priceIncome checkA very high yield often means the price has fallen or the payout is unsustainable — one reported example flagged a ~14% yield funded by a payout near 158% of earnings
FCF yieldFree cash flow per share ÷ priceThe most cash-honest valuation ratioLumpy in capex years; use multi-year averages

Market context (dated snapshot): the Nifty 50 traded at a P/E of ~19.3 on 30 October 2026, about 12% below its 5-year median of ~21.9 and below its 10-year median of ~23.2–23.3; the long-run median is ~20.9. Sources disagree slightly on the 10-year median (23.2 vs 23.3) — treat as ~23x. Do not compare today's P/E with pre-April 2021 figures without adjustment: NSE switched the index P/E calculation from standalone to consolidated earnings in April 2021, which mechanically lowered the published multiple. Index P/E moves daily — verify on NSE before acting.

Cash is truth — operating cash flow vs reported profit

Accrual accounting lets a company book revenue before it is collected and defer expenses that have been incurred. That is legitimate — until it becomes the whole story.

The accrual gap (Sloan, 1996)

Richard Sloan's landmark study (The Accounting Review, 1996, ~40,000 firm-years, 1962–1991) found that earnings persistence falls as the accrual component rises: the cash-flow component of earnings persists, the accrual component reverts. The lowest-accrual stocks outperformed the highest-accrual stocks by ~10.4 percentage points a year raw (~9.4 points size-adjusted) in his sample. The mechanism transfers to India even though the exact magnitudes are US estimates.

The quick test: over 5 years, cumulative operating cash flow should roughly track cumulative net profit. A persistent, widening gap is a demand for an explanation, not proof of fraud. Sloan accrual ratio (cash-flow form) = (Net income − CFO) ÷ average total assets. A commonly cited rule of thumb treats above ~10% as suspicious — label this a rule of thumb, not a law, and always read it over several years.

Red flags in the cash/profit relationship

Growth companies get one year of grace: a genuine one-off inventory build for a new product launch can distort a single year. Sloan's anomaly is a persistent pattern — always look at 3–5 years, not one.

Quality & governance checks for Indian companies

Indian markets have a specific governance risk that generic textbooks underplay: promoter control. Promoters often hold large stakes and run group structures where value can leak through related entities. The checks below are all free, from exchange filings.

Promoter holding, pledging, and selling

Related-party transactions (RPTs)

RPTs — deals between the company and promoter-linked entities — are where value most often leaks in Indian groups. Audit committee approval is required (Companies Act s.177 read with LODR Reg 23), with shareholder approval for material RPTs; SEBI widened the regime in 2023 (related-party definition threshold lowered from 20% to 10% shareholding). Half-yearly RPT disclosures are filed with the exchanges. Check: scale (RPT value as a % of revenue), and pricing (loans/guarantees to promoter entities, sales routed through promoter-owned intermediaries, assets bought from or sold to related parties). Historical illustration: Sun Pharma's domestic sales routed through promoter-owned Aditya Medisales — a whistleblower complaint, a SEBI-ordered forensic audit, and a 2021 settlement with fines for concealing the transactions.

Auditors — resignations, qualifications, rotation

Valuation methods — DCF, relative, SOTP, margin of safety

DCF (discounted cash flow)

Value = present value of future free cash flows, discounted at a rate reflecting risk (WACC), plus a terminal value. Theoretically correct — and the easiest to abuse: terminal value typically represents 60–80% of total DCF value, and sensitivity is extreme. An illustrative sensitivity table (base value 100 at 8% WACC, 2.5% perpetual growth) swings from 79 to 138 when WACC and growth each move by ±1% — a ~75% range; a 1% WACC change alone can move value by up to ~20%. Two iron rules (Damodaran): the perpetual growth rate cannot stay above the risk-free rate/nominal GDP growth, or the firm eventually outgrows the economy; and growth is not free — higher growth requires more reinvestment, and the two must be linked in the model.

Use DCF as a range, never a point. Run at least four combinations (cautious/optimistic discount rate × cautious/optimistic growth). If the current price sits below all four, the undervaluation is robust; if it sits in the middle, your assumptions are deciding. DCF breaks most on cyclicals at cycle peaks and on early-stage loss-makers.

Relative valuation, SOTP, margin of safety

Relative valuation compares multiples against peers and the company's own history. A multiple is a compressed DCF with the assumptions hidden — fast and comparable, but the assumptions are still there. Triangulate: at least one earnings-based and one cash-based multiple, plus the balance sheet. A stock at a 5-year-low P/E is not cheap if its earnings power fell faster than its price.

Sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) values each business segment separately and adds them up, net of corporate costs and debt. Essential for conglomerates and holding companies — and the reason holding companies often trade at a discount to SOTP. Use SOTP to understand where value sits, not as an automatic buy trigger.

Margin of safety: buy only when price is meaningfully below your estimated value — the gap is your protection against being wrong. The size of the gap should scale with uncertainty: wide for cyclicals, leveraged, or governance-discount names; narrower for predictable, cash-generative compounders.

The evidence on value investing in India

The SPIVA India scorecards are the honest baseline: in the 2024 edition, ~82% of large-cap active funds underperformed the Nifty 50 over 10 years, ~57% of mid-cap funds underperformed, and ~48% of small-cap funds underperformed; other vintages report 80–85% large-cap underperformance over 5–10 years. The exact percentages move by edition — check the latest scorecard rather than quoting any single figure. The pattern is consistent: large-cap India is hard to beat, while mid/small-cap markets are less efficiently priced and offer more genuine stock-picking opportunity. Fundamental analysis adds the most value where coverage is thin and the investor is patient; it is least likely to add value as a short-term trading edge in large-caps.

Sector & macro — what moves Indian sectors

Sector shorthand (starting points, not rules): banks/NBFCs — credit growth, NPAs, NIMs, cost of funds; IT — client budgets, dollar revenue, attrition, deal wins; pharma — US FDA actions, pricing, pipeline; autos — volumes, commodity costs, financing rates; FMCG — rural demand, raw-material inflation, volume vs price growth; metals/mining — global commodity cycle, China demand; energy — crude, refining margins, policy. Always verify sector claims against the company's own disclosures.

The 60-minute routine — analyse one Indian listed company, free sources only

Sources: Screener.in (financials, ratios, shareholding), BSE/NSE filings (results, annual report, concalls, RPT disclosures), company investor-relations page. Set a timer; the point is a repeatable first pass, not a research report.

MinutesStepWhat to do
0–10The business in one paragraphWhat does it sell, to whom, and why do customers choose it? Read the "About" section and the MD&A's first pages. If you cannot explain the business in two sentences, stop.
10–25Ten years of numbersRevenue, operating profit, net profit, CFO, and share count, year by year. Is revenue compounding? Is profit growing at least as fast as revenue? Does CFO track profit over 5 years? Is the share count stable?
25–35Ratios and the balance sheetROE/ROCE trend, D/E and interest cover, debtor/inventory days and CCC trend, dividend history. One page of ratios, compared with 2–3 sector peers.
35–45Governance sweepPromoter holding trend and pledging %. Auditor: who, any resignation or qualification in the last 3 years? RPT notes: scale and nature. Contingent liabilities vs net worth. Any SEBI/ED action or qualified opinion.
45–55Valuation sanityCurrent P/E vs the company's 5-year median and vs peers; EV/EBITDA and FCF yield; dividend yield vs payout sustainability. Write down the price at which you'd be a buyer — before checking the current price, to avoid anchoring.
55–60The verdict pageOne paragraph: what the business does, three strengths, three risks, the key number you'd monitor quarterly, and the buy price. If the verdict is "I don't understand it well enough," that is a valid output — it goes on the watchlist, not the portfolio.

Common traps

Sources